BizTalk and Windows Workflow Foundation – Which and When To Use?

Posted: March 30, 2009 in BizTalk
Tags: ,

In a very simply way:

  • Use Windows Workflow Foundation → Workflow within applications and human workflow
  • Use BizTalk Server → Workflow across applications – B2B, EAI, communication protocol abstraction

BizTalk is a product for BPM (Business Process Management) and EAI (Enterprise Application Integration), designed to implement workflow (“orchestrations”) across disparate applications.

WF is a developer framework designed to expose workflow capabilities within your applications.

Few questions you have to ask yourself in order to choose between WF and BizTalk Server:

  1. Do I need to work with other systems / platforms? Can I benefit from using BizTalk Adapters? Because of its focus on cross-platform integration, a large set of adapters is available for BizTalk Server that allows communication with a range of other software. WF is focused solely on workflow, not EAI, and so it doesn’t provide these things.
  2. Do I need to change the message structure / schema? Can BizTalk Mapper help me doing it? Messaging infrastructure? BizTalk provides schemas, tracking, reliable messaging, routing, transformations, etc…
  3. B2B services are required? WF doesn’t address this area, while BizTalk Server provides tools for working with trading partners,
  4. Do I want my solution to be able to scale out? WF runs In-Process and has threads limitations as a .Net application, while BizTalk is a very scalable deployable solution.
  5. The business process being implemented requires human workflow intervention? WF supports Human interaction with the progress of the workflow from approval to tracking, etc…
  6. Your process is typical a state machine workflows? BizTalk Server addresses system workflow, and so it lacks WF’s support for things such as state machine workflows.

WF is the replacement for BizTalk Server 2006?

No. WF provides only a small subset of this functionality: Workflow and Business Rules. While WF might be a simpler, more cost-effective solution for scenarios that do not require all of the other features that BizTalk Server 2006 provides, in no way does it supplant BizTalk Server 2006 for the core Enterprise Integration scenarios that BizTalk Server 2006 was designed to support.

BizTalk Server is going away?


Tags: BizTalk | WF

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s